The SRS-22r is a validated questionnaire intended to assess outcomes in patients with idiopathic scoliosis after spinal surgery. The first version, developed by the Scoliosis Research Society in 1999, had 24 items, and this was reduced to 22 items (accompanied by a name change) in the course of 3 major updates.
The measure covers 5 dimensions: pain, function, mental health, self-image and satisfaction with treatment. The SRS-22r is a valid tool for assessing patient-centered outcomes after scoliosis surgery, but has not been validated and is not intended for use for other patient populations. A completion time of 10 minutes can be assumed.
Use the following EVALUATION FORM to evaluate your patient and PRINT THE FORM when the evaluation is completed.
Scoring method and Interpretation
- The response to each item is associated with a point score from 1 to 5. For each of the 5 dimensions, a dimension score is calculated as the mean of the item points scored on that dimension. A total score is generated by averaging all the item points.
- If there are unanswered items, the “questions answered” denominator is reduced by the appropriate number. Items with more than 1 answer are removed from the calculation. Except for the satisfaction with treatment dimension, the dimensions cannot be scored if fewer than 3 items are answered.
- For the dimension and total scores, the best possible score (associated with the best health status) is 5 and the worst possible score (associated with the worst imaginable health status) is 1.
- Haher, Thomas R., et al. “Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients.” Spine 24.14 (1999): 1435.
- Smith, Justin S., et al. “Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age.” Spine 36.10 (2011): 817-824.
- Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery, 2009, 65. Jg., Nr. 1, S. 86-94.
- Asher, Marc A., Sue Min Lai, and Douglas C. Burton. “Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument.” Spine 25.18 (2000): 2381-2386.
- Niemeyer, Thomas, et al. “Validity and reliability of an adapted german version of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire.” Spine 34.8 (2009): 818-821.
- Asher, Marc, et al. “The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis.” Spine 28.1 (2003): 63-69.
- Climent, Jose M., et al. “Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire.” Spine 30.6 (2005): 705-709.
- Alanay, Ahmet, et al. “Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.” Spine 30.21 (2005): 2464-2468.
- Diarbakerli, Elias, Anna Grauers, and Paul Gerdhem. “Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D.” European Spine Journal 26.6 (2017): 1631-1637.
- Bagó, Juan, et al. “Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.” European Spine Journal 18.12 (2009): 1898-1904.